The Plain Truth - News and Message Board
Sign up Calendar
 
 
 


Reply
  Author   Comment  
BobBarney

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 14,592
Reply with quote  #1 
County seizes 83-year-old retiree's home over $8.41 debt
0
MADASHELL

Avatar / Picture

Registered:
Posts: 235
Reply with quote  #2 

[ornament-1024x576]By Brittany Hunter

Local Gov’t Says Merry Christmas by Using Eminent Domain to Take Small Business Owner’s Building

0
Larry

Registered:
Posts: 782
Reply with quote  #3 
Eminent Domain abuse:
 

Gov't Seizes Property For 'Economic Development' -- But Nothing is Built...
0
ChrisB

Avatar / Picture

Registered:
Posts: 867
Reply with quote  #4 
The link below is about local politics where a judge gave out search warrants to corrupt city officials like water and peoples homes and businesses were raided, some at 5 am to check for smoke detectors. Now does that smack you in the face of BIG BROTHER?????

President Bush issued an executive order preventing federal agencies from seizing private property except for public projects such as hospitals or roads. This only applies to the feds and not state or local governments where most of the abuses lie. Will the dems rescind the order? Probably. The corruption we see in the Blago affair just points to the abuses that governments place upon all of us. I think many of us know people who have been victims of this abuse. My dad lost his business to a Walmart and couldn't stop it. He didn't have the $100,000 to hire lawyers to fight it over his small building worth about $300,000 that was taken over by the city at appraised value of $175,000. He couldn't build anywere else for what he was compensated and closed shop.

 
http://hamptonspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/11/hamptons-election-notes.html



Crime does not pay ... as well as politics.
-- Alfred E. Newman
0
JoeVincent

Registered:
Posts: 594
Reply with quote  #5 

This is what happens when you have a supreme court that makes laws from the bench. Taking personal property away for use by anything other than a government project is stealing. Just because the SC says it's ok doesn't make it right or constituional.

0
jackie

Registered:
Posts: 563
Reply with quote  #6 
I found this in a search. It is amazing:
Government Property Seizures out of Control
Jarret Wollstein
Saturday, June 30, 2001
Across America, the Drug Enforcement Administration is seizing the luggage, cash and cars of hapless travelers. Under America's new civil forfeiture laws, mere possession of a large amount of cash or a drug dog barking at your luggage is sufficient probable cause for police to legally seize everything you are carrying.

  • In Albuquerque, N.M., in February 2000, DEA agents detained Sam Thach, who was traveling on Amtrak from Fullerton, Calif., to Boston, and seized $147,000 in cash he was carrying. Thach had no drugs. His crime? He had bought a one-way ticket with cash and didn't give Amtrak his phone number. (1)

  • The DEA seized $640,000 from Jennifer Leigh Ames while she was traveling on Amtrak on April 5, 2001. Agents say she looked nervous and had refused permission to search her luggage. (1)

  • Former Newark, N.J., policeman Carlos Hernandez discovered police searching his Amtrak sleeper cabin and demanding to search his luggage on July 22, 1999. Hernandez’s crime? He’s Hispanic and paid for his $694 ticket in cash. (2)

  • At Houston’s Hobby Airport, police stopped 49-year-old Ethel Hylton and seized her luggage because a drug dog had scratched it. Agents searched her bags and strip-searched her but found no drugs. They did find $39,110 in cash from an insurance settlement and her life savings, accumulated through over 20 years of work as a hotel housekeeper and hospital janitor.

    Ms. Hylton completely documented where she had gotten the money and was never charged with a crime. But the police kept her money anyway. Destitute, she had no way to fight them. (3)

    These outrageous seizures are completely legal and have been upheld by the highest courts in the land, including the U.S. Supreme Court.

    The DEA's Web site claims, "Property is seized by the DEA only when it is determined to be a tool for, or the proceeds of, illegal activities such as drug trafficking, organized crime, or money laundering." But the above examples show the reality.

    Under civil asset forfeiture, your property – not you – is charged with a crime. Hence the bizarre title of civil forfeiture cases: "United States vs. one 1998 Mercedes Benz," "California vs. 1711 Main Street," and so forth.

    Once your property is charged with a crime, it can be seized and kept by police, even if you are never convicted of anything. An appeals court in Florida even ruled that police can personally receive bounties of 25 percent of the value of anything they seize from you, such as your car, bank accounts or home.

    There are now more than 400 federal offenses and thousands of state and local offenses for which your cash, car, bank accounts and home can be seized – including shoplifting, hiring an illegal alien such as a maid (California), playing a car stereo too loud (New York), transporting illegal fireworks, gambling, having illegal drugs on your property, and merely discussing violating any law ("conspiracy”), such as underpaying your taxes.

    More than $1 billion in property is now seized without trial each year from innocent Americans, according to the national forfeiture defense organization FEAR (Forfeiture Endangers American Rights) (4). Seizures range from the pocket cash of poor street people to the cars of men accused of soliciting prostitutes to multimillion-dollar apartment buildings.

    Once police seize your property, the burden of proof is on you to prove your property’s innocence. Any suspected illegal actions of your relatives, guests, friends and employees on or even near your property are sufficient grounds to seize it.

    In Montgomery, Ala., police seized the home of 69-year-old Gussie Mae Gantt after videotaping police informants buying drugs in her yard. Ms. Gantt had previously called the police, complaining about drug dealing in her neighborhood, and had posted no-trespassing signs, but the drug dealers ignored them. Police waited until there was a drug deal in her yard and then seized her home. (5)

    Easy Money for the Government

    Once your home, car or bank accounts are seized under civil asset forfeiture laws, you can pretty much forget about ever getting them back. It's you versus the police and courts, who divide up the proceeds from your property according to formulas such as "80 percent for police, 20 percent for the court."

    If you want to fight seizure of your property, expect to spend at least $15,000 just to hire a competent asset defense attorney. Also expect the police to introduce hearsay evidence and to go through trial after trial, because the normal constitutional protections afforded criminal suspects don't apply to civil forfeiture of your property. (6)

    With all of this easy confiscated money, asset confiscation is now big business across America. In Volusia County, Fla., police seized more than $8 million worth of cars from motorists stopped for minor traffic violations along Interstate 95. (7) In Alameda County, Calif., police auction off hundreds of seized cars and boats every month.

    The latest wrinkle in civil asset forfeiture is police working with Amtrak, Greyhound, airlines and hotels to seize cash from travelers. The Albuquerque Journal reports that Amtrak gave the Drug Enforcement Administration access to its booking system in exchange for 10 percent of any monies seized by police.

    The DEA has similar deals with airlines at major airports and many hotel and motel owners in Los Angeles, Las Vegas and other large cities. DEA agents are now permanently stationed at major airports and hotels.

    So, the next time you pay for an Amtrak ticket, airline flight or hotel room in cash, don’t be surprised if you get a knock on your door from machine gun-armed DEA agents.

    Sources:

    (1) "Railway Bandits," Reason, July 2001, p. 14.

    (2) "Railway Bandits," Reason, July 2001, p. 15.

    (3) "Presumed Guilty: The Law's Victims in the War on Drugs," Andrew Schneider and Mary Pat Flaherty. Reprinted from the Pittsburgh Press, Aug. 11-16, 1991, pp. 5-6.

    (4) Forfeiture Endangers American Rights, http://www.fear.org.

    (5) An analysis of U.S. asset forfeiture laws, with extensive legal citations, can be found in the book "Your House Is Under Arrest," by Brenda Grantland, one of America's leading asset defense attorneys. Copies are available from ISIL, 707/726-8796, http://www.isil.org. Another excellent source is "Forfeiting Our Property Rights," by U.S. Rep. Henry Hyde, R-Ill.

    (6) Brenda Grantland, "Your House Is Under Arrest," Institute for the Preservation of Wealth, Burnsville, Minn., 1993, p. 61.

    (7) Orlando Sentinel, Aug. 2, 1992.

    Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
    Privacy

    A product that might interest you:
    Have an Opinion About This? Send an URGENT PriorityGram Today



  • 0
    EMAILEDToThePlainTruth

    Avatar / Picture

    Moderator
    Registered:
    Posts: 215
    Reply with quote  #7 
    sent in anonymously to our e-mail, have not verified info:

    My PAC is active in efforts to bring the abuse of eminent domain to the attention of American citizens. Sometimes this begins as "annexation."
     
    Here's a link to the most well-known case: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelo_v._City_of_New_London
     
    http://www.emdo.blogspot.com/
     
    In Texas the Rangers stadium land aquisition is notorious: http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/localnews/cowboysstad ium/stories/DN-eminentdomain_11met.ART.Central.Edition1.26b9e6e.html
     
    In San Francisco: http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cachewPBtFep-zcJ:www.mhalaw.com/mha/ne wsroom/seminar_flyers/eminentDomain.pdf+san+francisco+eminent+domain+c ase&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=8&gl=us

     
     
     
     


    __________________
    The Plain Truth!
    0
    BobBarney

    Moderator
    Registered:
    Posts: 14,592
    Reply with quote  #8 

    There is an even more "big brother' problem than just eminant domain! It's called local government Nazi-type thugs that under the badge of a fire marshall or building inspector can close down a business at will with NO COMPENSATION! It's done all the time, and many of these inspectors are "on the take" from local land developers that want to steal commercial real estate for pennies on a dollar! They send in an inspector, who finds bogus violations and close the business down, forcing the businessman to go out of business and then get low ball offers from some real estate tycoon within days! This is the problem when we vote in these politcians that want to usurp every right our forefathers gave us and we will end up in a Nazi Germany type state. This is not isolated to big cities. It done in almost every city nationwide! I hopefully will come up with some more information on this after some more research, but I know people that this has happened too. Let's leave that here for now.

    0
    ChrisB

    Avatar / Picture

    Registered:
    Posts: 867
    Reply with quote  #9 

    Just TAKE it.......

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,473404,00.html

    This is absolutely ridiculous. Just one more case of our government overstepping its bounds. They absolutely should NOT be able to take this land if the owner does not want to sell.

    0
    Previous Topic | Next Topic
    Print
    Reply

    Easily create a Forum Website with Website Toolbox.